home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- this file was taken from USENET group misc.security
- everything you wanted to know about infinity transmitters
-
- -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
-
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 87 13:09:33 EST
- >From: Dave Kucharczyk <ssr@tumtum.cs.umd.edu>
- Subject: Re: Infinity
-
- Yes, infinity transmitters do exist. they work on the principle that
- the audio path is made even before a dialed phone starts to ring.
- one sends a tone down the line which tells the infinity transmitter
- to "pick up" the phone before the ringing starts, and can then listen
- to teh location where the bug is planted. however these devices are
- pretty much made obsolete by the fact that any of the ESS switches
- do not open an audio path untill they receive answer supervision
- from the dialed end.
-
- ssr
-
- -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
-
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 87 11:51:35 EST
- >From: Larry Hunter <hunter-larry@YALE.ARPA>
- Subject: Re: Infinity
-
- Ever heard of an "Infinity Transmitter"?
-
- Yeah, they are pretty old tech bugging devices. They used to work fine,
- but with the advent of separate signalling and voice circuits in ESS
- (the electronic version of Ma Bell's switching system) they became
- obsolete.
-
- The idea was that the bug would listen to the phone line for a tone.
- When it heard the tone (or combination of tones -- they were called
- harmonica bugs because people often used harmonica notes to trigger them)
- it would pick up the phone and you could listen to what was going on
- in the room that the phone was in, before the phone rang. The problem
- in ESS is that the caller is not connected to the line when it is
- ringing -- the audio connection is only made when the phone is picked
- up -- so the bug cannot hear the incoming tone. No audio path to
- transmit the tone, no infinity bugs.
-
- One might imagine more sophisticated versions of the infinity bug; It
- could pick up the line WHENEVER it rings, check for the tone, do the
- infinity bug thing is the tone is present and if the tone weren't present
- it would have to generate its own ringing voltage (for the phone) and
- ringing tone (for the caller) until the line really got picked up. As
- you might imagine, the ESS infinity bug would have to be much more
- complicated (read more expensive and more likely to be detected) than
- the old style ones. I've never heard of anyone trying this.
-
- There are lots of telephone exchanges that are not ESS (step and crossbar
- are the two main alternatives) where the simple old infinity bugs still
- work fine. Any exchange where "Custom Calling" (e.g. call forwarding
- or call waiting) is not available is probably not ESS.
-
- People still sell things like infinity bugs as "home baby sitters" or
- as burgler alarms, but they answer the phone all the time even though
- they only turn the mike on if they receive a tone. These are usueless
- as bugs because no one can make calls TO the target -- the bug always
- answers the phone.
-
- You can rest easy re: infinity bugs, although you should be aware that
- it is a pretty trivial task to use electronic surveillance these days
- and that a lot of people do it.
-
- Larry
- -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
-
- Date: Sun, 29 Nov 87 16:27:38 EST
- >From: Mark W. Eichin <eichin@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
- Subject: Infinity Transmitters
-
- I saw an article on these once (on a bboard that got closed down about
- a year later for phone credit card postings). The main idea was that
- someone who wanted to tap the room would add this little circuit board
- to the phone, which would detect some sort of tone on the line when
- the phone first rang, inhibit the ring, and open the microphone.
- Something was mentioned about ultrasound (unlikely, given the quality
- of the phone lines, but it was being vague), and how you
- could tap in from anywhere as long as you could dial direct (ie. even
- from England). The main flaw was that the phone was of course busy (to
- the outside world) the whole time you were monitoring. It was
- allegedly used extensively by PI's to gather ``evidence'' for divorce
- proceedings.
- The article did not have much in the way of technical detail;
- oh well.
- Mark Eichin
- <eichin@athena.mit.edu>
- -------